Material impacts, risks and opportunities related to Enea Group’s operations have been determined based on the double materiality analysis, including a detailed analysis of climate-related risks and opportunities In accordance with the ESRS standard, this assessment included an impact materiality analysis and a financial materiality analysis.
SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
All material impacts identified by the Enea Group are a result of the Group’s business model, and a significant majority of them is also closely linked to the Enea Group Development Strategy. Detailed information on the links to the business model, effects on people and the environment and the time horizon of the impacts is presented in the tables entitled Material impacts/risks/opportunities identified by the Enea Group.
The Enea Group Development Strategy, adopted in 2024, analyzes current and future challenges, risks and opportunities in terms of climate protection and energy security. The Group’s strategy was developed account being taken of the evolving environment and the need to transform energy sources towards low- and zero-emission technologies. The strategic objectives it sets out are strongly linked to the identified material impacts, risks and opportunities and respond to challenges related to the sector’s broadly defined energy transition. A change of the business model, an increase in the share of renewable energy sources and the construction of a gas-fired power plant enable the Group to change the scope of its impacts and reduce the negative impact on the environment and on employees. By expanding and modernizing the distribution grid, we create the conditions for increasing the share of RES in the energy mix and improving safety and reliability of supply. On the other hand, the mitigation of ESG risks should help limit adverse financial or reputational effects. This approach allows the Group to improve the resilience of its strategy and business model to the possible future scenarios.
In 2025, the Enea Group developed and deployed the Sustainability Strategy based on previously identified material impacts, risks and opportunities. The strategy complements and details the Enea Group Development Strategy, in a way that directly translates ESG aspects to building the Group’s resilience.
The Enea Group estimates that capital expenditures related to the implementation of the Strategy for the period 2024-2035 will amount to approximately PLN 107.5 billion.
The Group assumes that PLN 67.1 billion will be invested using its own funds while the remaining PLN 40.4 billion will be financed through strategic joint venture partnerships, under the project finance model or using other off-balance sheet forms. This will enable the Group to grow and develop while remaining financially stable.
Intended capital expenditures by area:
During the reporting period, the Enea Group did not conduct a formal resilience assessment of its Development Strategy. However, in the course of developing the ESG Strategy, the Group considered the impact of individual material matters on its resilience to risks and adverse impacts, as well as the effect of using material opportunities. The objectives were selected in such a way as to strengthen the resilience of the ESG Strategy itself and, by extension, the Enea Group’s business model. The analysis of adverse impacts and risks conducted supports the conclusion that the Development Strategy, the ESG Strategy, and the Enea Group’s business model were all resilient to such occurrences as at the end of 2025.
Risks assessed at the highest rating (4), with a short-term likelihood of occurrence (within 1 year) and potential to materialize in 2026, are as follows:
- risk of a change in demand for services in the area of electricity (Enea Group),
- risk of pushing out high-emission units out of the merit order curve (Generation, Trading),
- risk of devaluation/depreciation of assets (Generation),
- regulatory and market risks associated with limited availability or unavailability of (wood, agricultural) biomass, resulting in failure to meet emission parameters and loss of revenue from the capacity market (Generation),
- risk of conflicts with NGOs due to the use of biomass (Generation),
- reputational risk associated with employees’ negative response to changes in the workforce resulting from the energy transition – social protests (Enea Group),
- risk of losing reputation, court action and fines for violating collective interests of consumers (Enea Group),
- risk of necessity to pay out compensation in accordance with UOKiK’s decisions issued in proceedings concerning guaranteed price contracts (Enea Group),
- risk of increasing corruption incidents due to a low level of anti-corruption knowledge among employees (Enea Group).
For some of these risks, an adjustments of the asset value may be required in the subsequent reporting period, for example, due to the need to recognize or increase legal provisions arising from administrative penalties or litigation costs.
Following the update of the double materiality assessment process in 2025, a decision was made in several instances, on substantive grounds, to consolidate two impacts into one. No impacts were removed. The ratings assigned to certain impacts were revised, reflecting actions implemented by the Enea Group during 2025. Impacts under standard S2 were reassessed, as the prior year’s analysis had not subjected them to a sufficiently granular evaluation. These changes are captured in Table SBM-3. Risks and opportunities were assessed in accordance with the assumptions set out in the Enea Group’s Methodology for Managing ESG Risks and Opportunities.
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model are presented in Section E1.
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model are presented in Section E4.
Significant locations of the Enea Group that may affect biodiversity and ecosystems are presented below.
The Company conducts its activities in the vicinity of protected areas, including the Uściwierskie Lakes and Polesie Natura 2000 sites, the Łęczyńskie Lakeland Landscape Park, the Polesie Protected Landscape Area, and the Chełm Protected Landscape Area. These areas are mostly terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems that require protection of habitats, species and landscapes. The company’s operations do not directly affect the unique surroundings, and most of the mining damage resulting from the formation of subsidence basins affects agricultural land. These, in turn, are monitored on an ongoing basis and then reclaimed.
The company conducts manufacturing activities in protected areas, including the Drawa National Park, the Koronowo Lagoon Protected Landscape Area, Wdecki Landscape Park, Natura 2000 Area of the Rega River Basin and Ostoja Pilska and the Protected Landscape Area of the Wałcz Lake District and the Gwda Valley. These areas were created thanks to the lakes formed as a result of damming for energy purposes. Enea Nowa Energia invests in improving fish passage conditions through the construction and upgrading of fish passes at selected power plants. The Water Management Plans, as a supplementary measure to achieve the environmental objectives set for specific rivers, have restored morphological continuity (mainly for diadromous fish), which has been interrupted as a result of damming the water at the weirs.
In the Kozienice municipality, the company is neighboring a Natura 2000 area and is located in an area of significant importance for biodiversity. The power plant has maintained environmental monitoring on its land and in the surrounding area for many years; for the past several years, no adverse impact of the plant’s operations on those areas, including the Natura 2000 site, has been identified. The company has been cooperating with the Stanisław Sakowicz Institute of Inland Fisheries – National Research Institute in Olsztyn, which conducts regular research on the impact of the plant’s power unit’s cooling system on the ichthyofauna of the Vistula. The results of the research do not provide clear evidence that the water withdrawal for cooling purposes at the Kozienice Power Plant poses a direct threat to any protected fish species.
Overhead power lines operated by the company cover approx. ¼ of the area of Poland (Wielkopolskie, Zachodniopomorskie, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Lubuskie voivodships and a small part of Dolnośląskie and Pomorskie voivodships). They run through certain nature conservation areas, such as national parks (Drawieński National Park with its buffer zone, Bory Tucholskie National Park with its buffer zone, Wielkopolski National Park with its buffer zone, Drawieński National Park, Woliński National Park with its buffer zone and the buffer zone of the Ujście Warty National Park), landscape parks, nature reserves, Natura 2000 areas and protected landscape areas. These areas require special protection for wild birds and other animals and rare plant species.
Through its double materiality assessment, the Enea Group identified a material adverse impact, namely destabilization and degradation of the ecosystem arising from hard coal mining operations. This activity affects stability of land surface and causes damage to ecosystems. Two further impacts relating to protected species were also identified: adverse effect of open cooling systems on aquatic ecosystems, and bird mortality caused by power lines. No material risks or opportunities were identified in this area.
Through its double materiality assessment, the Enea Group identified a material adverse impact associated with the use of open cooling systems at the Kozienice and Połaniec Power Plants. This constitutes an impact of own operations on endangered species.
ESRS 2 SBM-3 S1 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
All employees of the Enea Group are covered by the scope of this disclosure within ESRS S1. The Group distinguishes between operational and administrative workers and, in the case of non-employee workers, for example as individuals engaged under civil law contracts and individuals providing work through external companies. Impacts related to working conditions and impacts and risks related to occupational health and safety arise from the Enea Group’s business model, which is based on the generation and distribution of energy.
Negative impacts associated with workplace accidents occur incidentally, while issues related to future workforce changes, management diversity, or collective bargaining agreements are universal and typical for the entire energy sector. A potential negative impact has been identified in relation to workforce changes driven by the Group’s energy transition, which is embedded in its strategy and business model. As a result of the energy transition process, shifts in employment will occur, particularly within subsidiaries involved in mining and generation.
These changes will be gradual and caused for the most part by natural workforce processes, including the age structure at Enea Wytwarzanie, Enea Elektrownia Połaniec, and LW Bogdanka, where a portion of the workforce will reach retirement age in the coming years or become eligible for the “energy leave” (receiving severance pay or early retirement benefits). After the transition to a new business model, the number of jobs will decrease. At the same time, the HR policies, labor standards, and extensive training programs in effect in the Group foster a safe and supportive work environment. The Group demonstrates a commitment to employee development, equal treatment, and supporting them during the change process. Identified risks are associated with potential social reactions to the ongoing energy transition.
On the other hand, occupational health and safety (OHS) risks are incidental and relate to individual events, which is supported by a high OHS culture and well-established safety standards within the organization. The Group actively mitigates these risks by implementing the measures described in the Enea Group Development Strategy to 2035, the Sustainability Strategy, and the HR Strategy. In the long term, these actions are aimed at developing employee competencies, strengthening their position on the labor market, further enhancing safety standards, and ensuring a just transition.
The Enea Group operates exclusively in Poland and identifies no risk of forced or child labor. Furthermore, results from surveys, the double materiality analysis and whistleblower systems do not indicate any groups of employees particularly vulnerable to any form of harm.
Material impacts on workers in the value chain identified in the double materiality analysis process are based on the Enea Group’s business model, which relies, among other things, on their work in manufacturing products and supplying services. The analysis took into account the business model, which focuses on sourcing raw materials and equipment used for the generation and distribution of energy.
Workers in the value chain include individuals working at the Group’s locations but who are not part of its own workforce, such as employees of external companies performing activities on the premises of Group entities; they are exposed to incidental negative impacts associated with workplace accidents. A second group consists of workers of entities higher up the Enea Group’s value chain, such as suppliers, manufacturers and contractors, who, due to the potential negative impact arising from the absence of audits among suppliers, may be exposed to human rights violations. The analysis utilized statistics on accidents involving workers in the value chain, obtained by the Group from contractors, as well as reports on the global state of respect for human rights and information on the locations where power engineering machinery and equipment is produced.
The Group is preparing to draw up sustainability criteria for suppliers, including criteria relating to respect for human rights. The positive impact associated with requirements imposed on suppliers under the Enea Group Code of Conduct for Contractors was assessed as non‑material compared with the previous year. No material risks or opportunities were identified in this area during the update of the process.
In the double materiality analysis, impacts related to communities residing or working near the Enea Group’s operating sites were identified as material. As the Group defined the impacts, risks, and opportunities related to affected communities, it relied on community engagement processes (including social consultations for investment projects, mechanisms to report grievances, cooperation with local governments) and the results of environmental impact assessments. All material impacts are a result of the Group’s business model. Two negative impacts resulting from the Group’s operations were identified: the impact of mining, generation, and distribution activities on water and sanitation for local communities, and the impact of these activities on land. These impacts are actual, universal impacts.
Positive impacts on local communities stem from social and charitable activities, the Group’s commitment to a just transition for regions, and the current socio-economic scale of its operations, which fosters local entrepreneurship in the areas where the Enea Group operates. These factors are reflected in the ESG Strategy as specific objectives for implementing community engagement standards and the development of local social programs. No significant risks or opportunities related to the affected communities have been identified.
The impacts identified in the Double Materiality Analysis, on consumers and end users, that is on persons and entities receiving or collecting electricity, are a result of the business model adopted by the parent company or subsidiaries.
The extent of disclosure includes all consumers and end-users on whom the Group exerts a material impact. In the double materiality analysis, based on legal requirements, industry best practice and customer feedback, two groups of customers with specific characteristics were identified: persons with disabilities who may have difficulties in accessing information, and vulnerable customers, i.e. individuals exposed to energy poverty. The Enea Group does not offer consumers any products that:
- are by their nature harmful to humans, increase the risk of chronic diseases, or affect their health,
- may result in a potentially negative impact on their right to privacy, freedom of expression or non-discrimination,
- require accurate information to prevent any potentially harmful use.
All identified impacts are directly linked to the Enea Groups business model, specifically the sale and distribution of electricity and related customer service operations. The commitment to providing customers with the highest quality of service affects the Group’s strategy. Impacts related to personal data protection and the enhancement of customer service quality are integrated into strategic objectives aimed at achieving higher levels of customer satisfaction and the implementation of robust security standards.
The impacts exerted by Enea Operator, due to the specific nature of its business, focuses on the reliability of energy supply, network upgrades, enabling the development of renewable energy sources and the safe use of energy. These impacts are directly related to the Enea Group Development Strategy to 2035 and determine its provisions through statutory obligations in terms of energy security and energy supply. The Strategy establishes the following strategic development directions for distribution: ensuring continuous supply of electricity with appropriate quality parameters, and adaptation of the distribution network to operate in a decentralized power system. Negative impacts identified in this area are incidental and relate to personal data protection breaches and compliance with the competition law. These do not affect a specific customer group.
Positive impacts stem from the activities conducted by the Enea Group in developing and modernizing the distribution network and improving customer service quality (e.g., improving access to information and support). These affect all the Group’s customers. Risks and opportunities identified during the double materiality assessment are linked to these impacts and the Enea Group’s business model; they include, among other things, regulatory risks as well as risks and opportunities arising from the energy transition.
The implementation of the Development Strategy will enable the mitigation of risks and the materialization of opportunities for the Enea Group. The identified risks and opportunities pertain to all customers and are detailed in the tables below.
The descriptions of material impacts, risks, and opportunities (IROs) presented below may include references to 2024 data. This is due to the fact that the Group conducted the update of its double materiality analysis during the course of 2025. Information regarding the scope, timing, and updates of this analysis is detailed in disclosure IRO-1.
The implementation of the Development Strategy will enable the mitigation of risks and the materialization of opportunities for the Enea Group. The identified risks and opportunities pertain to all customers and are detailed in the tables below.
The descriptions of material impacts, risks, and opportunities (IROs) presented below may include references to 2024 data. This is due to the fact that the Group conducted the update of its double materiality analysis during the course of 2025. Information regarding the scope, timing, and updates of this analysis is detailed in disclosure IRO-1.
Key:

Key:

Key:

The table below presents material changes in terms of impacts, risks and opportunities compared to the list identified in 2024.